#TechNews
Automated driving · QNX

An automated-driving level is not a safety certificate.

The level describes who performs the driving task. Certification and type approval show what the product was assessed against and where that approval applies.

5 min read #TechNews analysis
Three questions
Level Who performs the driving task?
Evidence Against which evidence?
Approval Where does it apply?
The distinction

Level and certification are different things

SAE J3016 classifies how the driving task is shared between the driver and the system. A level applies to a specific feature and its operating conditions, not to the vehicle as a whole.

In certification, an independent body verifies that defined requirements have been met. ISO does not issue certificates. Type approval is the official process required before a vehicle can enter road traffic.

01 / Driving task

What does the level tell us?

It shows how the task is shared between driver and system; it does not award a safety score or road approval.

02 / Evidence and approval

What does certification verify?

Which product and version were assessed, within what scope and by which organisation.

SAE J3016

A higher level does not mean greater safety

At Levels 0–2, monitoring the road remains the driver's task. At Level 3, the system drives under defined conditions and may request intervention. Level 4 can operate without a driver within defined conditions; Level 5 is full automation.

L0Driver drivesNo automation
L1Steering or speedDriver monitors
L2Steering and speedDriver responsible
L3Conditional drivingMay request intervention
L4Defined conditionsCan be driverless
L5All conditionsFull automation
This is not a safety ranking; it shows who performs the driving task.
Three standards · three risks

They can be used together because they address different risks.

ISO 26262:2018 What happens if a component fails?

It addresses functional-safety risks caused by hardware or software faults.

ISO 21448:2022 What if the system is inadequate without a fault?

It focuses on risks that may arise from perception and decision limitations even when no fault occurs.

ISO/SAE 21434:2021 How is cyber risk managed?

It addresses the management of cybersecurity threats throughout the product lifecycle.

Where does QNX fit?

QNX provides a safety-focused foundation for automated driving

QNX is not a driving algorithm. It provides ADAS and automated-driving applications with a real-time, predictable and isolated operating environment.

ASIL D
QNX OS for Safety 8.0 is certified by TÜV Rheinland to ISO 26262 ASIL D.

This certificate does not cover the final vehicle. The manufacturer must validate the system separately within its own architecture and operating conditions.

From application to hardware QNX is the safety-focused software layer between decision algorithms and hardware.
01 / DataCamera · Radar · LiDAR · Positioning
02 / ApplicationADAS · Automated driving · Vehicle control
03 / QNX foundationQNX OS for Safety 8.0 · QNX Hypervisor for Safety 8.0
04 / HardwareCentral processor · SoC · In-vehicle network
Public comparison

Why do the scores differ?

Euro NCAP assessed nine systems for assistance competence and safety backup in critical situations.

Euro NCAP 2025 Assisted Driving results

4 June 2025, nine systems, two measures; scores out of 100.

Assistance competence Safety backup
Premium D-segment electric SUVVery Good
85%92%
D-segment electric SUVVery Good
83%89%
B-segment electric SUVVery Good
74%88%
B-segment electric hatchbackVery Good
73%92%
Premium E-segment electric SUVGood
71%71%
Three-row E-segment vehicleGood
62%79%
Premium B-segment electric SUVModerate
62%72%
B-segment hybrid SUVModerate
65%62%
E-segment electric saloonModerate
30%94%
Vehicle classes have been simplified. Each row represents one system; these results are not a market average, a certificate or an automated-driving level. Source: Euro NCAP, Assisted Driving assessment, 4 June 2025
30 km/h

The EU maximum speed for automated valet parking. The small-series limit for this application was removed in 2026.

5 core requirements

UNECE 2026: safety management, credible testing, a safety case, post-deployment monitoring and data recording.